| Home | Keaton Car | Kilmer Car | Clooney Car | Tumbler | 66 | Animated | Miscellaneous | Collection | Discussion | Links | Guestbook |
You are viewing old version of our website. Please click on HOME link to be redirected to new site. Thanks.
Batmobile Forum
 89 vs 92 |
||||||||||||
From: KeatonCar
| Posted: 4/16/2006 2:43:32 PM
| 
|
||||||||||||
Nerf Hurder.
Posts: 495 |
RE: 89 vs 92 just agree to disagree and let's end this. It would be a very sad thing to end the forum that both of you helped to enrich so much with a nasty fallout. A little song, a little dance..... Batman's head on a lance. |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: Jack
| Posted: 4/16/2006 2:49:50 PM
|
|
||||||||||||
No more CLTC?
Posts: 1947 |
RE: 89 vs 92 Lets see the pictures? |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: Kevin
| Posted: 4/16/2006 2:56:26 PM
|
|
||||||||||||
"Not"
Posts: 906 |
RE: 89 vs 92 Nitro took most of the pictures I took very little, I was more concerned about getting as many serial numbers off all the components and see how the canopy actuated. Nitro has all the engine area photos. |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: Jack
| Posted: 4/16/2006 3:01:30 PM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
No more CLTC?
Posts: 1947 |
RE: 89 vs 92 So you are saying that you saw the body tilt up off of the frame to expose the engine and such? Or did you see him actuate the switch and cause the front suspension rise because that's the hydraulics I seen. Here are more pictures. 
|
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: Jack
| Posted: 4/16/2006 3:11:29 PM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
No more CLTC?
Posts: 1947 |
RE: 89 vs 92 Hey Kevin I'm afraid that Nitro is going to be no help to your cause since he doesn't post pictures.  NITRO we're waiting.....
Keatoncar no worries it's all in good fun and to help get more people talking and more pictures and info out there. |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: Nitro
| Posted: 4/16/2006 8:30:58 PM
|
|
||||||||||||
Number 3
Posts: 741 |
RE: 89 vs 92
Ok what Kevin and I saw was Amos Dickey Went to the back opened the gas cap, flipped a toggle switch and the car raised drivers side up abought 5-6 inches. That is how i got in to take engine pics. |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: Nitro
| Posted: 4/16/2006 8:45:43 PM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Number 3
Posts: 741 |
RE: 89 vs 92
|
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: Nitro
| Posted: 4/16/2006 8:47:46 PM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Number 3
Posts: 741 |
RE: 89 vs 92
|
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: rusty
| Posted: 4/16/2006 9:21:00 PM
|
|
||||||||||||
89 made in 92
Posts: 915 |
RE: 89 vs 92 jack i think your right just by looking at the pictures..i dont see how it would..and mine has two pins you pull and the side latches..and it says batman returns car right there on a plate ..so it must be true..george barris says so
|
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: rusty
| Posted: 4/16/2006 9:21:48 PM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
89 made in 92
Posts: 915 |
RE: 89 vs 92 hey i wonder what they paid for that car? |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: Jack
| Posted: 4/16/2006 9:32:56 PM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Kevin is wrong
Posts: 1947 |
RE: 89 vs 92 Rusty $175,000.00 want to sell yours.
Well Kevin how does that Crow taste? 2 Piece body bolted together at the middle and no tilt body. Wait you said you saw it.... So I'm waiting...... Lets here it..... It goes something like this " Jack I'm sorry I was wrong and you were right...."
Nitro thanks. |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: rusty
| Posted: 4/16/2006 9:46:17 PM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
89 made in 92
Posts: 915 |
RE: 89 vs 92 has anyone ever seen one tilt ..i have heard of them haveing one.. but never seen a picture |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: Kevin
| Posted: 4/16/2006 9:48:09 PM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
"Not"
Posts: 906 |
RE: 89 vs 92 Didn't Nitro just say that the body tilted back at a flip of a switch. We were both there and saw the full tilt body. |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: rusty
| Posted: 4/16/2006 9:50:04 PM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
89 made in 92
Posts: 915 |
RE: 89 vs 92 and..175000..man has anyone ever been offer a price for your cars even thought there not finshed ..i mean people have bought cars from me that i was working on and people have not seen mine much since i havent had it long ..just wondering have yall had any offers |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: rusty
| Posted: 4/16/2006 9:53:10 PM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
89 made in 92
Posts: 915 |
RE: 89 vs 92 kevin the reason i see is that the front nose cant come past the frame horns with the bars on there like it is |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: Jack
| Posted: 4/16/2006 10:04:11 PM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
I miss TIM
Posts: 1947 |
RE: 89 vs 92 Kevin you really need to wake you. Nitro said "flipped a toggle switch and the car raised drivers side up about 5-6 inches". That was just the hydraulics for the front suspension. You know like air bags. The body never moved just the suspension. That's exactly what I said. Just admit you were wrong. You really hate to be wrong don’t you? See the red thing sticking up from the A-arm? That’s the hydraulic cylinder.
|
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: DonC
| Posted: 4/16/2006 10:10:49 PM
|
|
||||||||||||
Posts: 159 |
RE: 89 vs 92 and that looks like a 2bbl carb..... |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: rusty
| Posted: 4/16/2006 10:12:23 PM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
89 made in 92
Posts: 915 |
RE: 89 vs 92 one of the most expensive ones you have ever seen...175000 |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: Kevin
| Posted: 4/16/2006 10:28:40 PM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
"Not"
Posts: 906 |
RE: 89 vs 92 No the battery was almost dead at the time we were told that the body would rase to 5 to 6 feet with a fully charged battery. The T bar under the hood, the body rests on when lowered. |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: rusty
| Posted: 4/16/2006 10:40:48 PM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
89 made in 92
Posts: 915 |
RE: 89 vs 92
i dont see how the fiberglass lips would come by the frame horns .and all that metal !!!! |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: rusty
| Posted: 4/16/2006 10:43:08 PM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
89 made in 92
Posts: 915 |
RE: 89 vs 92 and theres only one quick plug on the wiring if it tilted it would pull the others apart |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: Jack
| Posted: 4/16/2006 10:45:11 PM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
I miss TIM
Posts: 1947 |
RE: 89 vs 92 You have got to be kidding me. You really believe that even after seeing the pictures? It was just a couple of actuators on the front suspension. All the pictures I took were with the car at full travel of the suspension. Believe me they body does NOT tilt. 6 feet...ha ha ha ha Here is another picture of it. 
The battery was dead when I got there so we used a battery charger. 
|
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: rusty
| Posted: 4/16/2006 10:50:47 PM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
89 made in 92
Posts: 915 |
RE: 89 vs 92 jack got any from under the rear ..should be some real big hinges back there |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: Jack
| Posted: 4/16/2006 10:53:05 PM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
I miss TIM
Posts: 1947 |
RE: 89 vs 92 Rusty you sick man you. jack got any from under the rear What the hell do you mean you sicko? |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: rusty
| Posted: 4/16/2006 10:55:35 PM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
89 made in 92
Posts: 915 |
RE: 89 vs 92 i mean pictures of that car...but i hope you dont have big hinges back there 
|
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Copyright © 2004-2005 chickslovethecar.com "Chicks Love The Car"
Batman is a registered trademark of DC Comics and Warner Bros.
This is a purely fan based site. No copyright infringement is intended. Click here for privacy policy