| Home | Keaton Car | Kilmer Car | Clooney Car | Tumbler | 66 | Animated | Miscellaneous | Collection | Discussion | Links | Guestbook |
You are viewing old version of our website. Please click on HOME link to be redirected to new site. Thanks.
Batmobile Forum
 89 vs 92 |
||||||||||||
From: Jack
| Posted: 4/2/2006 8:13:09 PM
| 
|
||||||||||||
Luv the Don
Posts: 1947 |
RE: 89 vs 92 Tick Tock......Tick Tock......Tick Tock......Tick Tock......Tick Tock......Tick Tock...... |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: Jack
| Posted: 4/3/2006 6:20:11 AM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Luv the Don
Posts: 1947 |
RE: 89 vs 92 Oh well..........  Maybe you meant This weekend......
Mark "will post all picts an info this weekend.." |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
From: MARK TOWLE
| Posted: 4/3/2006 1:10:43 PM
|
|
||||||||||||
COORS LITE
Posts: 246 |
RE: 89 vs 92 SORRY JACK I HAVE BEEN SWAMPED BUILDING WOODSIDES ALUMN DOOR SWEEPS ALL WEEK ANDMOST OF THE WEEKEND WAY MORE INVOLVED THAN I THOUGHT..WAS UP LATE LAST NITE AND DID FIND ALOT OF SCREEN GRABS OF THE 89 WILLLOOK TONITE FOR THE 92S IHAVE AND WILL POST AGAIN SORRY FOR THE DELAY COME TO THE MARKSIDE |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: Jack
| Posted: 4/3/2006 4:39:33 PM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Luv the Don
Posts: 1947 |
RE: 89 vs 92 I forgive you. 
|
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: rusty
| Posted: 4/13/2006 10:33:22 PM
|
|
||||||||||||
Posts: 915 |
RE: 89 vs 92
look at the body line on the turn table car |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: rusty
| Posted: 4/13/2006 10:34:36 PM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Posts: 915 |
RE: 89 vs 92 a 92 return's car ..... |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: Jack
| Posted: 4/14/2006 12:41:50 AM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Luv the Don
Posts: 1947 |
RE: 89 vs 92 Am I missing something? It's a Returns car and it's as wide or wider than the #1 and #2 cars. So Have we note decided that the "screen used" cars are the same and are wider than the "replica" cars? Oh yeah and now 2 weekends have past and no pix from Mark......Oh well. 
|
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: rusty
| Posted: 4/14/2006 1:40:21 PM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Posts: 915 |
RE: 89 vs 92 i mean look how the body line runs almost out on the rear fender |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: Jack
| Posted: 4/14/2006 4:52:36 PM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Luv the Don
Posts: 1947 |
RE: 89 vs 92 Can you point to it? |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: Jack
| Posted: 4/16/2006 5:56:07 AM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
No more CLTC?
Posts: 1947 |
RE: 89 vs 92 Well Mark you have less than 24 hours to post the pix on this forum. Rusty I still don't see what you are talking about. |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: rusty
| Posted: 4/16/2006 8:44:33 AM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
89 made in 92
Posts: 915 |
RE: 89 vs 92
|
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: rusty
| Posted: 4/16/2006 8:45:04 AM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
89 made in 92
Posts: 915 |
RE: 89 vs 92
|
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: rusty
| Posted: 4/16/2006 8:45:40 AM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
89 made in 92
Posts: 915 |
RE: 89 vs 92
|
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: rusty
| Posted: 4/16/2006 8:47:55 AM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
89 made in 92
Posts: 915 |
RE: 89 vs 92 hey and look at the distance between the tail light and the edge of the car...you can see the glare of the edge... |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: rusty
| Posted: 4/16/2006 8:52:12 AM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
89 made in 92
Posts: 915 |
RE: 89 vs 92
now look at this tail light ..and just think this is adead on shot..the picture above is at a angle that it should make it look wider |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: rusty
| Posted: 4/16/2006 8:57:46 AM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
89 made in 92
Posts: 915 |
RE: 89 vs 92 and the car that you and kevin seen that says its frome the returns movie is running 19.wide tires and they are filling up the rear wheel wells ..there are on there because the others wont fit.. |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: Tim
| Posted: 4/16/2006 9:19:20 AM
|
|
||||||||||||
Not Manson
Posts: 2411 |
RE: 89 vs 92 The line in this photo near is not the edge of the fender, it's the reflection of the white pole next too it and a couple of lights. It does make it look like a edge... The "body line" is on all of the cars including the Hot Wheels 1:18. I always thought that line was weird.
|
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: Jack
| Posted: 4/16/2006 9:50:23 AM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
No more CLTC?
Posts: 1947 |
RE: 89 vs 92 Rusty I think you lost me. What is your point? We know that the "Replicas" are narrower in the rear quarters. That would explain the narrower tires. The car in thw wherehouse is the Returns Turn table car and looks as wide if not wider than the 89/Onstar car pictures. So I'm lost are you saying that the wherehouse car is smaller/larger than what? If anything I think it all proves that the 89 and the 92 are all the same and the only difference is with the replicas not the screen used cars. |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: Jack
| Posted: 4/16/2006 9:58:29 AM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
No more CLTC?
Posts: 1947 |
RE: 89 vs 92 Dang lost my edit feature....warehouse!! |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: rusty
| Posted: 4/16/2006 10:30:52 AM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
89 made in 92
Posts: 915 |
RE: 89 vs 92 im saying i know that the real no. 1 and 2 was used in the returns movie but i think jay build more for the movie...i think he pulled molds off the no.1 then cut the molds down and thats where are cars came from..and the tape marks came from..and like i said what about the one kevin and you looked at that suppost to be a real one that has small tires on it..i think its a jay smaller car |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: Jack
| Posted: 4/16/2006 10:43:42 AM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
No more CLTC?
Posts: 1947 |
RE: 89 vs 92 It is a smaller Jay car like all the ones WB contracted and sold. Like the one you took pictures and posted a long time ago. I think we all believe that the cars that were sold by WB to privet collectors and Six Flags were all smaller. I think you pointed out it was probably to fit a trailer or to make it street legal since anything over 8 foot would require a "Wide Load" permit. Also all of the ones that were sold had the same number and I don’t think any of us think any of them were screen used. Well the owners think they were. |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: Jack
| Posted: 4/16/2006 10:46:23 AM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
No more CLTC?
Posts: 1947 |
RE: 89 vs 92 Like this one. 
|
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: Jack
| Posted: 4/16/2006 10:49:25 AM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
No more CLTC?
Posts: 1947 |
RE: 89 vs 92 So I guess you can call ours a 92 if you want to but I would just say it's a modified 89. And unless Mark comes up with something then I think we are all saying that the "movie" cars the 89 and 92 the Batman and the Batman Returns are all the same. I guess you could call ours a Jay car or who knows who actually did the modification. Why don't you call Jay and ask him? |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: rusty
| Posted: 4/16/2006 10:55:23 AM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
89 made in 92
Posts: 915 |
RE: 89 vs 92 well at leased i got somebody to talk ....  i really would like to talk to jay but he's hard to find... but i have been talking to a guy that is big in the general lee deal and he said he could get me in to see the cars a wb but i would hate to make that trip ..i dont fly
|
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
From: rusty
| Posted: 4/16/2006 10:57:14 AM
|
|
||||||||||||
|
89 made in 92
Posts: 915 |
RE: 89 vs 92 my name is rusty i have a 89 ... |
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Copyright © 2004-2005 chickslovethecar.com "Chicks Love The Car"
Batman is a registered trademark of DC Comics and Warner Bros.
This is a purely fan based site. No copyright infringement is intended. Click here for privacy policy